<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Would Liquids on a Plane Really Work?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sandstorming.com/2006/08/would-liquids-on-a-plane-really-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sandstorming.com/2006/08/would-liquids-on-a-plane-really-work/</link>
	<description>the storm is brewing...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 07:40:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: anon 2</title>
		<link>http://www.sandstorming.com/2006/08/would-liquids-on-a-plane-really-work/#comment-14756</link>
		<dc:creator>anon 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 07:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sandstorming.com/2006/08/would-liquids-on-a-plane-really-work/#comment-14756</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re allowed to bring two lighters on board aswell as matches so lighting it wouldn&#039;t be a problem. Sercuirty was pretty tight before this UK thing, but i remember once in Africa they just searched our bags by hand cuz they didn&#039;t have any x-rays. That was in zimbabwe by the way, before the socio-political downfall, so i guess now it would be even easier to take things through.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re allowed to bring two lighters on board aswell as matches so lighting it wouldn&#8217;t be a problem. Sercuirty was pretty tight before this UK thing, but i remember once in Africa they just searched our bags by hand cuz they didn&#8217;t have any x-rays. That was in zimbabwe by the way, before the socio-political downfall, so i guess now it would be even easier to take things through.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maddy</title>
		<link>http://www.sandstorming.com/2006/08/would-liquids-on-a-plane-really-work/#comment-14071</link>
		<dc:creator>Maddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2006 03:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sandstorming.com/2006/08/would-liquids-on-a-plane-really-work/#comment-14071</guid>
		<description>If you think about it, if the crew noticed the fumes over the pacific or atlantic ocean it&#039;d be too late.  There would probably be no where to land in time and no way of deactivating the chemical reaction.  At that point in time you&#039;d be screwed... it&#039;s just a thought.  But you make a good point Dan.. and yeah it is pretty lame.

*This is my attempt to distract myself from uni work.. because I swear there are already enough people studying the prevention of heart attacks... aren&#039;t there?*

more distraction:
In light of the terror threat a local radio station asked listeners to call in with their bad experiences on planes.  One guy called up with a story that went kind of like this:
He and his partner were on a flight coming into land in egypt.  The plane was on a sharp descent and the passengers were rather alarmed by it, which wasn&#039;t helped by an egyptian woman at the back of the plane screaming an unidentified phrase repeatedly. The plane finally came down kangaroo hopping and bouncing everywhere.  As the passengers left the aircraft the man asked another passenger what the woman had been screaming.  Translated she said:
&quot;No survivors! No survivors! No survivors!&quot;
It&#039;s times like these you&#039;d be thankful for language barriers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you think about it, if the crew noticed the fumes over the pacific or atlantic ocean it&#8217;d be too late.  There would probably be no where to land in time and no way of deactivating the chemical reaction.  At that point in time you&#8217;d be screwed&#8230; it&#8217;s just a thought.  But you make a good point Dan.. and yeah it is pretty lame.</p>
<p>*This is my attempt to distract myself from uni work.. because I swear there are already enough people studying the prevention of heart attacks&#8230; aren&#8217;t there?*</p>
<p>more distraction:<br />
In light of the terror threat a local radio station asked listeners to call in with their bad experiences on planes.  One guy called up with a story that went kind of like this:<br />
He and his partner were on a flight coming into land in egypt.  The plane was on a sharp descent and the passengers were rather alarmed by it, which wasn&#8217;t helped by an egyptian woman at the back of the plane screaming an unidentified phrase repeatedly. The plane finally came down kangaroo hopping and bouncing everywhere.  As the passengers left the aircraft the man asked another passenger what the woman had been screaming.  Translated she said:<br />
&#8220;No survivors! No survivors! No survivors!&#8221;<br />
It&#8217;s times like these you&#8217;d be thankful for language barriers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan</title>
		<link>http://www.sandstorming.com/2006/08/would-liquids-on-a-plane-really-work/#comment-13972</link>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2006 13:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sandstorming.com/2006/08/would-liquids-on-a-plane-really-work/#comment-13972</guid>
		<description>god thats lame... a few hours is too long, and what kind of person would do chemistry for hours at 35,000 ft?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>god thats lame&#8230; a few hours is too long, and what kind of person would do chemistry for hours at 35,000 ft?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.sandstorming.com @ 2012-02-11 07:44:59 -->
